tenth April 2025
Geneva, Switzerland

I’m again the place I began. Form of. Once I started doing no matter it’s we do out right here, (let’s name it endurance diplomacy) it was the 58th session of the Fee on Human Rights. The Roman Empire hadn’t lengthy since fallen, good telephones had been but to excite after which blight our lives and the Human Rights Council wasn’t even a twinkle within the late, nice Kofi Annan’s eye.
Again in 2002 the previous Fee on Human Rights was struggling to deal with a rising variety of new or power crises in Afghanistan, Burundi, Chechnya, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Iran, Myanmar, the Occupied Palestinian Territories Sudan, and elsewhere.

It’s disheartening that most of the international locations on the Council’s present agenda had been additionally thought of for a few years on the Fee, and in a number of circumstances issues have gotten worse, not higher. Russia managed to defeat the decision on Chechnya the next yr regardless of clear experiences of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial executions, arbitrary detentions, and indiscriminate army pressure towards civilians. Maybe if the Fee had been in a position to keep its unbiased reporting on Chechnya, Russia might have felt much less emboldened to commit the appalling violations which later adopted in Georgia, Syria and Ukraine or to persecute its personal folks on the dimensions we see right this moment.
However earlier than I get too gloomy there have been successes too – Timor Leste was nonetheless on the previous Fee’s agenda after I arrived. It turned formally unbiased quickly afterwards and is now a robust voice for human rights on the UN. The conditions in Sierra Leone, northern Uganda and the previous Yugoslavia – all then topic of Fee resolutions – have reworked since 2002.
The massive story from this Council session was Syria . Those that oppose nation resolutions will inform you that they don’t make a optimistic distinction and even that they make issues worse. For the previous 14 years the Council has drawn common consideration to {the catalogue} of atrocities by the Assad regime. And the Syria Fee on Inquiry has left nobody in any doubt in regards to the horrors which have taken place. Over latest years, different crises had been drawing consideration away from Syria, however the Fee continued its essential work because of the Council’s resolutions.
In a historic breakthrough this session, the brand new Syrian Authorities supported the UK-led decision and granted entry to Syria to the Fee of Inquiry for the primary time. Clearly there’s a lengthy approach to go to result in peace justice and accountability for Syrians – however this was massively important demonstration that the brand new Authorities is keen to interact with the Council to make progress. And an essential reminder that staying the course on human rights is important.

The early discuss of the session was in regards to the US’s absence, significantly when Israel and Nicaragua joined them in strolling away from the Council. The fear was that extra international locations may observe and plunge the Council right into a full-blown disaster. Fortunately that didn’t occur, although Nicaragua’s refusal to finish its Common Periodic Overview presents a difficult problem to UN human rights system.
The US additionally wasn’t a member of the Fee in 2002 after shedding an election bid towards different western international locations. Again then, the US stayed within the room, however their much-reduced presence contributed to the Fee’s faltering outcomes that yr. Issues by no means fairly recovered and the Fee quickly entered its demise spiral earlier than being dissolved in 2006.
Encouragingly, the US’s departure appears to haven’t had the identical adverse impact on how the Council went this time round. Iceland’s decision on Iran handed as soon as once more this time, making a revamped investigation mechanism to look into a variety of violations, whereas additionally renewing the Council’s Particular Rapporteur. The UK-led decision on South Sudan handed by an elevated margin, little doubt due, no less than partially, to the latest deterioration within the state of affairs there and the detention of first Vice President Riek Machar. Ukraine’s decision to resume the Fee of Inquiry into Russia’s violations towards Ukraine additionally handed by a strong vote margin, demonstrating ongoing solidarity with Ukraine and condemnation for Russia’s barbarity.
There have been some fascinating new issues too. A primary ever decision on the human rights implications of anti-personnel mines led by Algeria, Croatia, South Africa, the UK and Vanuatu handed by consensus with robust help. And it seems we may have a brand new human rights treaty on the rights of older individuals following a decision by Argentina. Do older folks want particular new rights, or simply higher measures to ensure their rights are upheld? I’m not precisely positive what I give it some thought to be sincere, however I really feel much more supportive of the thought now than I used to. 58 Council classes will do this to you.
